Poll results: Do you feel management in your organization is transparent?
Here are the results of the poll in Newsletter #15
Do you feel management in your organization is transparent?
17,6% (What transparency?)
27,0% (We work the mushroom strategy: keep them in the dark and feed them shit)
43,9% (From a need-to-know policy moving in the right direction)
11,5% (Radical transparent)
Total votes: 245
Although there is still a lot to win, it’s good to see we’re moving in the right direction.
When management is transparent about what is really going on within the organization, employees are more accountable, more engaged and more creative in their jobs. In a transparent culture everybody has access to the same (important) information and issues, which in turn helps everyone to take better decisions, and to understand how their contribution and collaboration could make or break the success of the organization.
Are you a better leader/employer/employee due to transparency? Or maybe disengaged due to lack of transparency? What would you suggest to create more transparency? Do you have any tips? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments!
Do you want to cast your vote in our next poll? Subscribe to our newsletter here: https://corporate-rebels.com/newsletter
We recently held a brainstorming session at our office for the newest on-demand course for the Academy—one about the concept of Psychological Safety. During the session, we discussed how one of the things you can do to create psychological safety is to embrace failure instead of avoiding it. But this is hard because failing is not fun. It absolutely sucks. Therefore, it is better not to celebrate the failure itself but rather celebrate the lessons learned from it.
How many times have you heard of companies coaching candidates for ‘senior teams’, ‘top talent’ and ‘future leaders? That is, the ‘special ones’ who are worth coaching attention! Sure, there will be talent brewing who, with good coaching, will go from ‘potentially great’ to ‘actually great’. And some brilliant coaches do great work with senior teams. However, does a ‘coaching for senior leaders’ paradigm pass scrutiny, given how organisations are changing? Or is the potential of other staff hamstrung by a short-sighted view of who is worth investing in?
So, we write a monthly column for MT/Sprout, a Dutch media platform. Last month, we wrote about how our agendas are always packed full with meetings. We followed that with this month's column about how replacing all these meetings with e-mail is not a good alternative. Why? Because there is a big chance you will waste even more time and money. Allow me to explain.