Poll results: How progressive is the decision-making process in your organization?
Here are the results of the poll in Newsletter #16
How progressive is the decision-making process in your organization?
29,5% (Not at all)
22,6% (Pretty good)
8,4% (Bucket List material)
Total votes: 190
Knowing that much of the frustration in today's workplaces is linked to the way decisions are made, overall this is not a very positive result.
People at the top of the organization with the most decision making power are the farthest away from the actual work that’s being done. At the same time, people at the bottom of the organization often don't have the authority to make decisions on their own. The result? Ill-informed, slow and terrible decisions that are made in a process that frustrates everyone involved.
There’s definitely not one right way to make decisions. What works well in one organization doesn’t necessarily work in another. Finding the right process is a powerful way to become a better workplace. And if you want everyone to be fully engaged at work? Allow, and require, everyone to make decisions.
Are you working in a place where everyone is making decisions? We’d love to hear a successful transformation story, tips, tricks and experiences.
Do you want to cast your vote in our next poll? Subscribe to our newsletter here: https://corporate-rebels.com/newsletter
We recently held a brainstorming session at our office for the newest on-demand course for the Academy—one about the concept of Psychological Safety. During the session, we discussed how one of the things you can do to create psychological safety is to embrace failure instead of avoiding it. But this is hard because failing is not fun. It absolutely sucks. Therefore, it is better not to celebrate the failure itself but rather celebrate the lessons learned from it.
How many times have you heard of companies coaching candidates for ‘senior teams’, ‘top talent’ and ‘future leaders? That is, the ‘special ones’ who are worth coaching attention! Sure, there will be talent brewing who, with good coaching, will go from ‘potentially great’ to ‘actually great’. And some brilliant coaches do great work with senior teams. However, does a ‘coaching for senior leaders’ paradigm pass scrutiny, given how organisations are changing? Or is the potential of other staff hamstrung by a short-sighted view of who is worth investing in?
So, we write a monthly column for MT/Sprout, a Dutch media platform. Last month, we wrote about how our agendas are always packed full with meetings. We followed that with this month's column about how replacing all these meetings with e-mail is not a good alternative. Why? Because there is a big chance you will waste even more time and money. Allow me to explain.