Performance Review advice?
Hello everyone! My team is looking to revamp our yearly performance review process. Does anyone have any templates, techniques or examples that work for them? What we struggle with is having a clear way for people to understand the metrics they are being measured by and having an artifact to speak to that, so that it is actionable and trackable for the following year. Any thoughts?
How about assessing them based on the purpose and values of the organization? Letting their peers assess them on these topics? The Belgian ministry of social security does that well on values (https://corporate-rebels.com/frank-van-massenhove).
Or simply moving towards the "stop, start, continue" approach used by among others Netflix (https://corporate-rebels.com/annual-performance-reviews/).
And here's how Buurtzorg and Handelsbanken do it: https://corporate-rebels.com/high-performance-culture/
Soon we will also publish on Haier's way of doing this.
Is this of any help? I would also be curious to learn more from others as we often encounter this problem in traditional organizations too.
In 2012, Haier gave 12,000 managers a choice: "you can leave, or join our new structure." Some left, many stayed and joined one of 4,000 small independent companies within Haier—the so-called 'microenterprises' (MEs). Many academics, management gurus and other companies were amazed with how the ME structure stimulated entrepreneurship. So why the hell would Haier fiddle with it's structure, again?
Yash Pakka is a compostable tableware manufacturer in Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh. Their products are made from sugarcane waste and are 100% compostable, and the factory is even powered by its own power grid that uses rice husk as fuel. But they’re innovative not just in terms of what they make, but how they organise.