Pay by time or Pay by task?
I was having a Slack discussion recently with some of my friends at Bloch&Østergaard (Working to create workplaces where people want to show up).
We started discussing the article about Microsoft testing a 4-day work week which has also been posted in the forum here.
The discussion then transitioned into why we are paying people for their time in the office and not their effort.
For many years – a couple of hundred – we have rewarded employees according to effort=time=money.
Will it make more sense in the future to remove the "time" factor in this equation? Maybe it should be something more like tasks/roles/responsibility = money.
This is partially what we see with the growth of the gig economy. Companies pay to get something done - not necessarily for the hours worked.
So the discussion for the forum is two-fold.
1) Are there any examples out there of companies that are moving away from pay-by-time and towards pay-by-"something else"? And doing it internally - not by just hiring gig workers.
2) In general a discussion on how "pay-by-"something else" potentially could work.
Looking forward to hearing input!
Be the first rebel to reply.
In 2012, Haier gave 12,000 managers a choice: "you can leave, or join our new structure." Some left, many stayed and joined one of 4,000 small independent companies within Haier—the so-called 'microenterprises' (MEs). Many academics, management gurus and other companies were amazed with how the ME structure stimulated entrepreneurship. So why the hell would Haier fiddle with it's structure, again?
Yash Pakka is a compostable tableware manufacturer in Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh. Their products are made from sugarcane waste and are 100% compostable, and the factory is even powered by its own power grid that uses rice husk as fuel. But they’re innovative not just in terms of what they make, but how they organise.