Employee Engagement: The Business Case

Pim de Morree
Written by Pim de Morree April 10, 2019

Our recent post, “The Way We Work Is Broken” revealed the engagement sinkhole and the associated burnout rate. We highlighted the impotence of leaders in solving this problem. We highlighted the gap between current and desired workplaces.

491 1140x0

Now we offer data that shows why organizations urgently need to fix their broken workplaces. This is the business case for employee engagement.

Inhumane and shortsighted

That only 15% of all employees are engaged at work is very, very sad. And though many organizations realize this, it does not spur them to action—to make changes. Their focus stays only on performance—especially money and output. Engagement is a nice-to-have, not a must-have.

This data is a strong wake-up call for all organizations. Beyond the personal pain, the disengagement epidemic severely affects business outcomes. It costs heaps of money!
Click to tweet

But that’s not just inhumane; it’s also painfully short sighted. Here are five reasons why.

1. Return on engagement

If you are not in business for a higher purpose, take a long look at the money first.

When work is exciting and motivational, people thrive and organizations flourish. This is not just our belief. This is reality. The persuasive financial evidence is below.

Glassdoor‘s Best Places to Work gave much better returns than investing in the average S&P500. Check the stock price data below. It’s impressive!

Stock Investement 1 1

2. Increased performance

A Gallup meta-study highlights the positive influences on organizational success. Workplaces with high employee engagement seriously outperform those with lower scores. Engaging workplaces enjoy higher profitability, productivity, and customer ratings. They also have lower turnover, absenteeism, accidents, and quality defects.

Gallup’s study clearly reveals the correlation between engagement and business performance. Moreover, the findings are highly consistent across different organizations, industries and parts of the world.

Key Business Outcomes 1

3. Replacement costs

But wait, there’s more. What about the costs of people leaving because they dislike their workplace?

Well, these are probably higher than we imagine. Think of the replacement costs: recruiting, interviewing, new equipment, onboarding, and training. Plus, there’s a lost opportunity cost—the cost to an organization when it can’t grasp opportunities that appear because roles are vacant or understaffed

Employee Engagement: The Business Case.
Click to tweet

The Center for American Progress found the cost of replacement is around 20% of an employee’s annual salary. For the highest-paid jobs, this can be 213% of the salary!

4. Cost of absenteeism

Disengagement relates to other costs like absenteeism. Earlier we showed the connection between engagement and sick leave, burnout rates, and so on. Now, let’s look at other associated costs.

Various studies cite absenteeism as accounting for around 15-20 percent (!) of payroll costs (direct and indirect). Some of these are: wages paid to absent employees, wages paid to temporary employees, and wages paid for overtime. Oh, and don’t forget the admin expense of managing all this absenteeism.

Then there are other indirect costs: “reduced productivity, poor goods or services because of understaffing or overtime fatigue, safety issues from inadequately trained employees, poor morale from employees who had to do extra work and managers’ time spent on discipline and finding replacements.”

So, take the payroll costs of your company, and do the calculations. Is absenteeism costing you an extra 15-20%, too? It adds up, very quickly!

5. Toxic workers

But we’re not finished yet—there is more. Take the cost of so-called toxic colleagues.

Research by Northwestern University’s Prof. Dylan Minor tries to uncover the cost of toxic workers. With colleagues, he examined worker behavior. They assessed if they were benefiting the organization (top performers) or harming it (the toxic workers). They then compared the value of hiring top performers versus parting with toxic ones.

They found that engaged top performers boosted the performance of colleagues. Indeed, the top 1% of these colleagues earned an extra $5,300 for the organization: merely by doing above average.

Then the research gets very interesting. Typically, the cost of a toxic colleague was estimated at $12,800! The cost of being surrounded by toxic colleagues is much greater than the benefit of working with top performers.

The verdict

This data is a strong wake-up call for all organizations. Beyond the personal pain, the disengagement epidemic severely affects business outcomes. It costs heaps of money!

For many organizations, engagement is a nice-to-have, not a must-have. But that’s not just inhumane; it’s also painfully short sighted. Here are five reasons why.
Click to tweet

That’s why it’s time to act. It’s time to lift awareness – everywhere. The more who know, the higher the chance that we can all make an impact.

So, take some action:

  • Share this post online
  • Rally the troops. Get on stage and spread the message inside your team/department/company
  • Join the online community
  • Get inspired twice a week by subscribing to our newsletter. Fill in your email address below.

“Nothing happens until something moves”…

Written by Pim de Morree
Pim de Morree
As co-founder of Corporate Rebels I focus on: researching, writing, speaking, and building our company.
Read more
Read more
Aug 11, 2024
Stapelstein®'s Transition to Steward-Ownership
Maike Kauffmann Written by Maike Kauffmann
Ever wondered why our economy is spiraling into climate chaos, skyrocketing inequality, and a concentration of power? It's driven by one…
Read more about Stapelstein®'s Transition to Steward-Ownership
Jun 16, 2024
Why You Should Only Recruit Spontaneously Combustible People
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
The late Kazuo Inamori, the charismatic founder of two major Japanese companies, Kyocera and KDDI, won worldwide fame for his unorthodox…
Read more about Why You Should Only Recruit Spontaneously Combustible People
Apr 07, 2024
8 Principles to Create the Ultimate Employee Suggestion Scheme
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
Many companies recognize the importance of involving their employees to enhance the workplace. However, tapping into the collective…
Read more about 8 Principles to Create the Ultimate Employee Suggestion Scheme
Mar 10, 2024
Elevate your Recruitment Approach: 10Pines' Hiring Strategy
Joost Minnaar Written by Joost Minnaar
We are soon launching our newest course in our Academy. This course will be all about how self-managing organizations tackle their…
Read more about Elevate your Recruitment Approach: 10Pines' Hiring Strategy
Mar 03, 2024
The Scare Them Away Letter: A Recruitment Tool for Self-Managed Companies
Lisa Gill Written by Lisa Gill
Hiring people in a self-managing organization can be tricky. Bossless organizations may seem like a dream, but once people start working in…
Read more about The Scare Them Away Letter: A Recruitment Tool for Self-Managed Companies
Dec 17, 2023
The Power of Coaching in Self-Managing Organizations
HappyHenry Written by HappyHenry
Employees in self-managing organizations obviously don't have managers, but that doesn't mean there isn't somebody there to support them.…
Read more about The Power of Coaching in Self-Managing Organizations
Read all articles

Download: Free Guide

Unlock our in-depth guide on trends, tools, and best practices from over 150 pioneering organizations.

Subscribe below and receive it directly in your inbox.

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.